Evolution of knowledge in the sport

0
219

Piaget (1932) studied two aspects in relation to the knowledge that is elaborated from the sets of rules, understanding that the rules constitute a social reality that is transmitted from generation to generation: first, the practice of the rules, the way in which children of different ages apply the rules effectively; and second, the awareness of the rule, the way in which these children first represent the obligatory, sacred or decision-making character, evolving from heteronomy to the autonomy of the rules of the game.

From his study he established four stages referring to the practical knowledge of the rules:

It must be borne in mind that before the common epl중계 appears, there can be no rules as such. And from that common game and, at first, this will be a purely motor and individual game. In which one can only speak of motor rules, influenced in turn by a symbolism that invades the child’s motor schemes. There is also a lack of continuity and direction in the succession of behaviors, but these behaviors that the child uses are quickly schematized and even ritualized.

Then individual ritual and symbolism appear,

Forming the substructure or the necessary condition for the development of collective rules and signs, but not the sufficient condition. It will be the awareness of the obligation that distinguishes the rule itself from regularity, related to an element of respect or submission that was not included in the simple ritual.

An egocentric level between 2 and 5 years

It begins at the moment when the child receives from the outside the example of the codified rules. Then, through verbal exchange, the child begins to socialize, but not being able to place himself on an equal plane with respect to his elders, he is isolated.

It is a level of development of the rule characterized by the indication of different rules by each child, there being no vigilance between them, nor do they unify their respective rules. Children play for themselves, their goals are different and they obtain an essentially motor pleasure.

The nascent cooperation appears.

Around the age of seven or eight, there is already a concern for mutual control and unification of the rules, but there is still considerable hesitation regarding the general rules of the game.

There is also the need for a mutual agreement with the other members of the game, the idea of ​​winning, how to beat others. But they still cannot be considered to know the details of the rules, being unable to legislate the set of possible causes. What they do is copy the best informed and play a simplified game.