Pakistan Top Advocate for Criminal Offense:
If you need in Pakistan top Advocate from law firms in Lahore for any criminal offense you may contact Jamila Law Associates. It is usually advisable for the Customer to have a friend with him when making significant purchases so that the friend can witness what was said and promised by the salesman. If the shopkeeper’s promise is broken, the Customer may reject the goods, although he will probably have to accept damages though Pakistan top Advocate from law firms in Lahore.
Liable Customer:
Apart from being liable to his Customer, the shopkeeper may well have committed a criminal offense under the Trade Descriptions Acts. Buying goods on credit, The Customer does not lose any of his legal rights if he buys goods on credit (e.g., HP, credit sale, or a credit card such as Barclaycard or Access but not an Overdraft or bank loan). He will usually be better off than if he had paid in cash.
Consumer Credit Act 1974:
The Consumer Credit Act 1974 makes the credit supplier (usually a bank or finance company) equally liable to the shopkeeper for the goods’ quality. In other words, the shopkeeper’s four promises apply to the credit supplier as well, and he can be sued through Pakistan top Advocate from law firms in Lahore if, for instance, the goods are not fit for their usual purpose. If the shopkeeper is liable for breaking one of the shopkeeper’s promises, so is the credit supplier. The Customer can use either the shopkeeper or the credit supplier.
Law Firms in Lahore:
By Pakistan top Advocate from law firms in Lahore the legal basis of this liability depends on the type of credit: if the goods are bought on HP, then the Customer’s contract will be direct with the finance company (see blog 566 for how HP Works). Thus, in effect, the finance company is the seller of the goods and is liable for the shopkeeper’s promises, but this only applies if the credit provided was not more than £15,000. If the goods are bought on another form of credit (e.g., Access), then the Consumer Credit Act 1974, section 75, makes the credit supplier liable, but only if the cash price of the goods was between £100 and £30,000.
 Illustration:
Fred buys a car for £5,000, a suit for £150, and a radio for £45. All three items are defective. It brought the car through a bank loan he had arranged; it bought the suit on Access and the radio on Barclaycard. He can sue through Pakistan top Advocate from law firms in Lahore the three retailers, but can he also sue his bank, Access, and Barclaycard. The answer is that he cannot sue his bank since that was a personal loan arranged by him. Nor can he sue Barclay’s card since the price of the radio was under £l00 and thus excluded from the liability rules. But, he can go against Access regarding the suit, even though Access was in no way to blame or for the faulty case. He has the same rights against Access as he does against the shopkeeper. The moral is clear-always try to pay by credit card, not cheque.
